This new legitimacy and you can reliability of the questionnaire was indeed examined and remedied in line with the pre-shot

This new legitimacy and you can reliability of the questionnaire was indeed examined and remedied in line with the pre-shot

Toward , this study chosen one or two kinds within the Chengdu Shishi secondary school and Jinniu secondary school correspondingly, distributed 3 hundred forms, recovered 278 questionnaires, subtracted 12 invalid forms and you will 266 legitimate surveys. The latest specialized research is completed off .

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the sports leisure attitude scale with 16 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.87, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001), and three common factors could be extracted, and the corresponding Cronbach' ? coefficients were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.83 respectively. In addition, the overall scale ? coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.92, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.91, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, with good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three common factors (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the scale has good reliability and validity.

Canonical relationship study are a statistical approach used to sample new relationship knowledge between one to group of control parameters and another group from expectations details

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure motivation scale with 21 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.78, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 4 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.79–0.85, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.88; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.04 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the four dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure barriers scale with 17 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.85, Bartlett ball test p < 0.001). The scale could extract three common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.82–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.94, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.02 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure satisfaction scale with 25 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.82, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 6 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.81–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.84; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 in order, which was all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the six dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Analytical Analytics

It will discover the limit correlation between the linear combination out-of handle details in addition to linear mix of criterion parameters. Therefore, canonical correlation studies evaluating the new canonical correlation blend of numerous expectations variables and you can numerous control details, Canonical relationship data can make a mix of extreme and you caribbean cupid ekÅŸi will unimportant canonical correlation. Essentially, it can supply the after the basic advice: a person is the common relationship coefficient is also reflect brand new relationship degree between your linear mix of handle variables plus the linear consolidation of basic details. The typical relationship coefficient need certainly to started to a life threatening top to represent the significant relationship between them sets of linear combos. The second is new view coefficient (we.age., the newest square value of regular relationship coefficient R). It means the normal products of one’s basic variable can be become informed me because of the typical activities of your manage variable (not less than 10%). The 3rd ‘s the structural coefficient (normal weight). It’s intended to handle the latest correlation between your changeable and brand new standard varying to their respective regular linear combos. Absolutely the worth of new coefficient must be more 0.31 to spell it out you to their particular typical linear combinations have explanatory power.

Lasă un răspuns

Adresa ta de email nu va fi publicată. Câmpurile obligatorii sunt marcate cu *