Of a lot desire to monogamy yet see it challenging to implement; which is, of many find it hard to stand faithful plus in love that have one person for many its life. Cheating from inside the monogamous relationships escalates the threat of sexually sent infections because exterior sexual experience is remaining magic and you will cheaters was quicker probably use preventative measures in bed (Conley, Moors, Ziegler, Karathanasis, 2012). Yet ,, anyone overwhelmingly examine monogamous relationship xpress kodu nedir as the problem-free and people perceive anyone involved with CNM much more almost certainly so you’re able to pass on sexual problems (Conley, Moors, Matsick, mais aussi al., 2013).

Monogamy will be a fool-evidence plan for halting the newest pass on regarding intimately carried bacterial infections. Yet not, monogamy is active insofar just like the both couples attempt bad having infections in the very beginning of the relationship and stay intimately loyal regarding the lifetime of the partnership. Since the sexual cheating is common, and the threat of hiring an intimately carried illness grows whenever folks have more than one intimate lover, we checked safe sex practices among one or two customers which keeps multiple intimate couples: intimately disloyal some one (those who work in monogamous matchmaking which admit he’s got cheated on the partner) and folks involved with CNM. I discovered that intimately being unfaithful people were more unlikely than simply anybody engaged in CNM to utilize condoms and other traps during their extradyadic stumble on, tell their “monogamous” mate in regards to the find, and get tested to possess sexually sent bacterial infections (Conley, mais aussi al., 2012). Intimately unfaithful individuals were in addition to likely to build condom fool around with errors (age.g., getting brand new condom towards wrong way) than simply some body from inside the CNM relationships in their newest extradyadic intimate stumble on (Conley, Moors, Ziegler, Matsick, Rubin, 2013). At exactly the same time, intimately disloyal people were less inclined to use safe intercourse actions making use of their “monogamous” mate than some one when you look at the CNM dating (thereby place its basically monogamous lover at stake).

Therefore, the assumption one monogamy is secure and problem-totally free is tenuous: Those who identify by themselves as monogamous but-end upwards cheat fool around with protection quicker often and less correctly. But not, people in CNM dating normally have an open dialogue about exactly who he has got intercourse that have and are very likely to explore protection efficiently. Such findings suggest that among people who do extradyadic gender, CNM might provide a much safer avenue to own sexual expression than sexual infidelity.

More the fresh Merrier?

Pulled together, CNM relationships will be feasible and you can effective solutions in order to more traditional conceptions away from monogamy. CNM relationships is described as an unbarred dialogue and communications throughout the plus numerous close and you will/otherwise intimate partners in the a person’s existence. There is high assortment inside relationship strategies across the globe (Schmitt, 2005), and you will what people thought “normal” (monogamy) inside their personal class may not be always a knowledgeable behavior for all. CNM generally seems to hold unique masters which might be less common in the monogamy, plus intimate range, large internet sites, feelings out-of compersion (an emotion described as the contrary regarding jealousy), and personal gains (Schechinger Moors, 2014). But not, CNM just isn’t rather than challenges, particularly given the concern with stigmatization centered one’s low-normative dating (Moors, Matsick, Ziegler, Rubin, Conley, 2013). For this reason, possible “costs” and you can “benefits” so you’re able to CNM should be thought about to the a single and you will pair base.

Additionally, people into the CNM matchmaking report that he could be happier, fulfilled, the amount of time, and also in love (de Visser McDonald, 2007; Jenks, 1985; Ritchie Barker, 2006)

While the this new scientific study regarding CNM is actually a promising system away from scholarship, there can be minimal empirical facts on precisely how to top “open up” a great monogamous relationships. If you are offered some kind of CNM arrangement, there are well-known push “DIY” books to take on, including the Ethical Whore (Easton Hardy, 2009), Spinning the guidelines (Barker, 2013), and Checking (Taormino, 2008). I remind boffins to look at correspondence tips, scheduling, and other relational issues of the and work out a transition away from monogamous so you can consensual low-monogamous relationships. And you may, i prompt folks, for folks who meet (or see) an individual who is within a good CNM relationship, dont assume that body is good cheater, a new player, or even in an undesirable dating-just because they truly are openly non-monogamous the help of its partner(s).